Obama Economist Wants Bigger Government
Economist Calls For Fairness
Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Alan Krueger says that increasing taxes on the wealthy would stimulate the economy and that wealth inequality is a "threat" to our economy. Krueger says that "...a more fair distribution of income would hasten economic growth." He wants to redistribute the income by making the tax code even more progressive! Lord help us … another liberal idiot who thinks that wealth is distributed by government, not earned.
Anti-poverty spending is at record levels. The rich are shouldering more of the tax burden than ever. The federal budget is more redistributive than ever.
In 1980, the richest 20 percent financed 55 percent of all federal revenue. Today, they finance a record 69 percent. In that time, the portion of all taxes paid by the top 1 percent has doubled. The portion paid by the bottom 40 percent has dropped nearly in half.
At a time when the Obama administration should be desperate for jobs to be created, it is puzzling why his chief economist would suggest raising taxes on the very people who would create those jobs. Krueger says the Bush tax cuts should expire for the wealthy in order to shift income from the top 1% to the bottom 99%.
The Wall Street Journal addressed this idea of progressive outcomes in an article I talked about yesterday on the program: A Step Backward for Economic Freedom in 2012.
When you actually look at the performance data, it turns out that the "progressive" outcomes so highly touted by those favoring big government programs to address every societal ill are actually achieved more efficiently and dependably by the marketplace and the invisible hand of free economies.
The free market can do a better job than the government of addressing societal ills? Blasphemy! What do we need? More government. Bigger government. More spending. More redistribution. This will surely encourage economic growth because we know better what the people need. Right? Wrong. From the Wall Street Journal …
"Rapid expansion of government, more than any market factor, appears to be responsible for flagging economic dynamism. Government spending has not only failed to arrest the economic crisis, but also—in many countries—seems to be prolonging it. The big-government approach has led to bloated public debt, turning an economic slowdown into a fiscal crisis with economic stagnation fueling long-term unemployment."
Comment here and email us at YourVoice@speaknowamerica.org.
Moms, Dads, Grandparents need a place to vent about the direction our government is taking? Go to MomsAndDadsBeHeard and speak out. Be part of bringing our Great country back.



technology news It is so neccesary to be informed. Live moves at such a raipd pace every second counts. Every human being is curious about being up to date all the time.
Reply to this